Statutory conversation practice — complete practitioner guide
A reference for practitioners and supervisors across seven UK sectors — children's services, adult social care, health, youth justice, witness intermediary (MoJ), HR, and legal advocacy. One subscription, one account. From sector choice to team-level quality analytics — no real case data, no pass/fail penalties, no employer surveillance.
Simulation-based learning for UK practitioners
Statutory Conversation Simulator is an AI-powered practice platform for professionals who carry legal and safeguarding duties into conversations with families, service users, colleagues, and employees — safely, repeatedly, and without using real case data.
| Framework | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Working Together to Safeguard Children (2026) | Multi-agency safeguarding duties, thresholds, and partnership working |
| Children Act 1989 | Section 17 (need), Section 47 (significant harm), care proceedings |
| Equality Act 2010 | Protected characteristics, reasonable adjustments, non-discrimination duty |
| Care Act 2014 | Adult safeguarding, assessment, person-centred approach |
| ACAS Code of Practice | HR / disciplinary and grievance procedures |
| KCSIE 2026 | Keeping Children Safe in Education — safeguarding responsibilities for DSLs (in force 1 Sep 2026; replaces 2025) |
| Human Rights Act 1998 | Article 8 (family life), proportionality in intervention decisions |
| Mental Capacity Act 2005 | Two-stage capacity test, best interests, least restrictive principle — Adult Social Care and Health |
| Criminal Justice Act 2003 / LASPO 2012 | Youth sentencing, referral orders, and breach proceedings for Youth Justice workers |
| Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA) | Registered Intermediary duties — communication assessment, ABE support, Ground Rules Hearings, trial evidence. MoJ RI Guidance 2024. |
| Mental Health Act 1983 (amended 2007) | Detention, assessment, and treatment powers — Health and CAMHS practice |
| CPR / CrimPR / FPR (themes) | Courtroom advocacy structure for Legal Advocacy — formative practice aligned to procedural themes, not a regulator assessment |
Four steps to a complete practice session
Choose sector → choose role → Start conversation. Optional: choose a situation, or More options for the full card deck. Then practise with the AI persona and read the debrief.
?express=0 if you need Try now; on that screen Choose my own setup returns to role and Lab. The AI disclosure before a conversation is a different screen — it appears every session, not only the first time. Click How to use on the Card Deck for the interactive guide. Press ? in the header for help mode (Esc exits). More: FAQ — first visit · audience vs AI disclosure · in-app help.
Default home is Start conversation. Choose a situation or More options (Lab) if you want themes or the card deck. In Lab, a tiny chip toggles Quick start vs Custom. Both still send your choices to the AI — there is no offline case library.
| Path | What you do | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Quick start | Pick one ready-made theme for this sector, then Generate. | Default for practitioners. Fast first case. Themes follow the sector — Adult is Care Act, not children's anxiety. |
| Custom | Full A–J card deck. Lock and shuffle parameters. | When you want a specific process stage, target group, or training focus. |
Plans & usage
KallosSim is free to start. Paid plans remove the scenario cap and add team features. See pricing for current rates.
Every KallosSim page has Sign in / Account in the header. Hub Start free opens Create account. Free practice needs a real account first — Create account or Sign in — then pick your role and start a conversation. Quota sits on the account, not an anonymous cookie. On production (app.kallossim.com) use Continue with Google, or email and password. The same Google address as an existing password account opens that account — you do not get a second login. Pilot invites must be accepted with the invited email.
A Vercel git preview (*.vercel.app, except dialogtrainer-en.vercel.app) signs you in as QA Guest and does not use Google.
Production and that Vercel production alias reject QA Guest.
If you are on a preview, stay on that host — in-app Guide and Back to app stay on the same deployment.
Public “Open app” links on the marketing site go to production; if a link jumps environments, use Back or paste your preview URL.
Full answers: FAQ — sign in · preview or production · demo links.
| Plan | Practice allowance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 20 text + 3 voice sessions in total per account | No credit card. Voice capped at 10 min per session. The count does not reset monthly. |
| Individual | Unlimited text · 10 voice sessions/month | All sectors, full debrief, CPD export. Billed monthly or quarterly. |
| Company | Unlimited scenarios (per seat) | Five seats, org admin, team analytics. User-facing name: Company (not “team”). |
| Larger organisation | Quoted seats, DPA, onboarding | Council / NHS and multi-team path. User-facing name: Larger organisation (internal id organisation). |
Pricing and the app use Free, Individual, Company, and Larger organisation.
A Stripe receipt may show an internal id: professional = Individual, team = Company (5 seats), organisation = Larger organisation.
FAQ: plan names.
Open your profile (top-right) to see Free scenarios with a progress bar when you are on the Free plan. When you use all 20 text sessions (or all 3 voice sessions), generation of that type pauses until you upgrade. Past sessions and debriefs remain available to review. Each voice session is capped at 10 minutes (not 3 minutes). Role cards that mention AI practice describe the Free allowance — they do not mean unlimited sessions. See pricing and FAQ — Free limits.
Invited testers can install KallosSim from Apple TestFlight. This is internal testing, not an App Store listing. Short shareable page: /ios. FAQ: iPhone TestFlight.
Install: get TestFlight from the App Store → open the invite you were sent (same Apple ID) → Install → sign in with the same email and password as the website.
Internal TestFlight currently installs KallosSim (Capacitor) com.kallossim.app.
KallosSim Native com.kallossim.app.native is a Phase 1 sibling — it may be installed separately until it shares the TestFlight listing.
Native is Sign in, Start conversation, and text chat — not the card deck, voice, debrief, Google sign-in, or other sectors.
Tell them apart by the name under the icon; both source icons use the same brand mark.
There is currently no in-app Help (no ? / Hjelp) on iOS Native. Use this handbook and the FAQ in Safari or Chrome.
Seven sector entry points — one platform
KallosSim is a single platform with one account and one subscription. Each sector loads the statutory framework, role list, and process stages appropriate to that work. Knowledge depth is graded — see platform qualities. Switch sectors anytime from services — your progression history follows you.
hr-app.html); the other six run through app.html with a sector banner at the top. Legal Advocacy is a standalone entry and knowledge pack — same account and subscription.
| Sector | Depth | Entry URL | Roles in picker | Framework focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children's Services | Founding | /children/app |
Social Worker, DSL, IRO, Early Help, Family Support, RM (Children's Home), SSW, ISW, SENCO | Working Together to Safeguard Children 2026, Children Act 1989, KCSIE 2026 |
| Adult Social Care | Early access | /adult-care/app |
Adult Social Worker, Registered Manager (CQC adult) | Care Act 2014, MCA 2005, Making Safeguarding Personal |
| Health / NHS | Early access | /health/app |
Health Visitor, CAMHS Practitioner | NHS safeguarding themes (thinner than a full NICE library) |
| Youth Justice | Early access | /youth-justice/app |
YOT Worker, Police CPO | YOT / AssetPlus / trauma-informed themes while corpus grows |
| Witness Intermediary | Early access | /witness-intermediary/app |
Registered Intermediary only | YJCEA 1999, MoJ RI / ABE / Ground Rules themes |
| HR & Employment | Dedicated | /hr/app |
Line Manager, HR Business Partner, ER Specialist | ACAS Code, Employment Rights Act 1996, Equality Act 2010 — formative, not CIPD assessment |
| Legal Advocacy | Content-ready | /legal-advocacy/app |
Barrister, Solicitor Advocate, Pupil Barrister, CPS Advocate, LA Family Advocate, Duty Solicitor | CPR / CrimPR / FPR themes — formative (not BSB/SRA assessment) |
/uk/adult-care/app the first theme is refusing a care package (Care Act wellbeing and MCA presumption of capacity) — not Claire / parental anxiety from Children's. FAQ: Adult vs Children's themes.
Legal Advocacy practises oral advocacy steps (opening, examination-in-chief, cross-examination, procedural objection, closing).
It is a learning tool for England & Wales courtroom skills — not a Bar Standards Board, SRA, or Inn competence assessment.
Cases and personas are AI-generated. Enter via /legal-advocacy/app.
Registered Intermediaries have a primary duty to the court, not to a local authority safeguarding process.
Card B process stages are criminal justice steps — intermediary request, communication assessment, ABE planning, ABE interview support, Ground Rules Hearing, and criminal trial evidence.
The AI knowledge pack is criminal_justice, not Working Together. RI practitioners should enter via /witness-intermediary/app, not Children's Services.
Registered Manager (Children's Home) — Ofsted children's residential; appears in Children's Services. Registered Manager (Adult Care) — CQC adult care home; appears only in Adult Social Care. They share a label in conversation but have different statutory frameworks, process stages, and evaluation emphasis.
Your role (Card A) filters Cards B (process stage), D (target group), E (dimension), F (conversation type), and I (training focus). Card F adapts when you change Card B. Card J (Maturity) appears only for young-person target groups. Shuffle respects these constraints — you will not land on an incoherent combination.
Markets outside the UK
KallosSim is a UK product with an England-first statutory pack, and supports pilot training packs for other jurisdictions. Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are preview. Each market uses its own statutory sources, process stages (Card B), and evaluation rubric — not UK Working Together unless you stay on the UK entry paths.
/ca/children/app) when you intend to practise under that jurisdiction.
| Market | Landing | Children's app | Statutory focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada (Ontario pilot) | /canada | /ca/children/app | CYFSA 2017 |
| Australia (NSW pilot) | /australia | /au/children/app | National Framework, ROSH |
| United States (all states selectable; CA deepest) | /us/children · /usa | /us/children/app | CAPTA / ICWA + state; CA deepest; TX/NY/FL beta — selectable ≠ full county manual (qualities) |
| Ireland | /ireland | /ie/children/app | Tusla, Children First |
On the home page, services, and pricing you may see a banner such as Practising in Canada? Our Ontario · CYFSA 2017 training pack may fit better than UK Working Together. Choose View Canada pack to open the landing page, Stay on UK to dismiss for this visit, or × to hide suggestions for 30 days. See privacy — cookies & local storage.
International pilots are children's services only. Adult social care, health, youth justice, witness intermediary, HR, and Legal Advocacy remain UK-only. Full reference: international markets user help (Markdown).
The Card Deck
Ten parameters that together define your practice scenario. Start with Card A — your professional role — then configure or shuffle the remaining nine to match your learning goals.
Card A is the most important selection you make. Your professional role is chosen on the role picker before you enter the deck, then shown on the role banner at the top. Your role determines which process stages, target groups, and training focuses appear on the remaining cards, and how the AI persona perceives your authority. A parent wary of a statutory Social Worker will respond very differently to a DSL from their child's school — or to a Registered Intermediary in a court setting.
| Role | Sector | Decision authority | Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Worker | Children's Services | Allocated function by stage; CSC decides s.47; no solo removal | Family Help, s.17, s.47, LAC, PLO |
| DSL | Children's Services (education) | Refer, share, challenge response — cannot start s.47; CSC owns threshold | School/college (intended), conference, Family Help |
| IRO | Children's Services | LAC reviews and dispute resolution; Cafcass extraordinary | Looked-after, review |
| SENCO | Children's Services | Education SEND — no S.47 authority | Referral, EHC / school SEND assessment, CIN plan |
| Health Visitor | Health | Healthy Child Programme; safeguarding referral | Early help, home visit, pre-birth |
| Registered Manager (Children's Home) | Children's Services | Ofsted; personal liability for welfare | Residential, disrupted placement |
| Registered Manager (Adult Care) | Adult Social Care | CQC; adult safeguarding | Assessment, S42 enquiry |
| ISW | Children's Services | Advisory; expert witness — no S.47 | Complex assessment, court |
| SSW — Foster | Children's Services | Carer support — NOT child's SW | Fostering, placement support |
| Registered Intermediary | Witness Intermediary | Court communication — duty to court | ABE, GRH, trial evidence |
| Adult Social Worker | Adult Social Care | Care Act assessment, S42 enquiry | Adult safeguarding |
| YOT Worker / Police CPO | Youth Justice | Justice + welfare; MASH partner | Referral, assessment, breach |
| CAMHS Practitioner | Health | Clinical + safeguarding | Referral, assessment, risk |
| Line Manager / HRBP / ER | HR | ACAS-governed workplace process | Disciplinary, grievance, RTW |
Registered Manager (Children's Home) is Ofsted children's residential. CQC adult Registered Manager is only in Adult Social Care.
These labels are easy to mix up. The table below restates the in-repo children's knowledge pack (WT 2026 / FFP / Children Act 1989) — not a new statutory claim. Fag review via Boss if local practice uses different labels.
| Term | What this pack says | What it is not (in this pack) |
|---|---|---|
| Family Help | WT 2026 / Families First Partnership pathway for targeted early help and much s.17 child-in-need work. | Not a ladder that always precedes s.47. Not the same thing as CAF. |
| CAF | Common Assessment Framework. Not the 2026 national label here — use Family Help assessment/plan and Team Around the Family. | Not CAFCASS (the court advisory service). Not a claim that every LA has dropped the letters CAF. |
| CFA | Child and Family Assessment — the name this pack uses for the statutory assessment under s.17 CA1989 (Assessment Triangle; pack records 45 working days). | Not a replacement for s.47. The Act names the duty (s.17), not “CFA”. Health does not own a CFA. |
| SENCO “assessment” | EHC / school SEND assessment — education SEND co-ordination and EHC processes in school or college. | Not a Child and Family Assessment (CFA) under s.17. The SENCO does not own a CFA. |
Glossary: Family Help pathway · Section 17 · Section 47 · SENCO. FAQ: Family Help, CAF, CFA.
Each of the remaining nine cards controls one dimension of the generated scenario. Click any card to flip it and choose from all available options, or shuffle freely.
| Card | Label | What it controls | Example options |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Process stage | Where you are in the statutory or organisational timeline | Children's: Referral · Assessment · S.47 · CP Conference · LAC · PLO · Step-down · Closure. Adult: Needs assessment · S.42 enquiry. Witness: Communication assessment · ABE planning · Ground Rules · Trial. HR: Informal discussion · Investigation · Disciplinary · Grievance · RTW. Legal Advocacy: Opening · Examination · Cross-examination · Objection · Closing |
| C | Complexity | Depth and challenge of the scenario and persona | Foundation · Intermediate · Advanced |
| D ⚙ | Target group | Who you are speaking with. Options are filtered automatically to match your role (Card A) — a Supervising Social Worker will only see foster carer and young person, not birth family. | Young person · Parent / carer · Foster carer · Service user · Family group · Care leaver · UASC |
| E | Diversity dimension | The analytical lens foregrounded in this scenario — shapes the persona's profile and the criteria emphasised in your debrief | Protected characteristics · Cultural background · Mental health & trauma · Power dynamics · Neurodiversity · Domestic abuse |
| F ⚙ | Conversation type | The setting and format of the interaction. Options are filtered to match your process stage (Card B) — a CP Conference only ever involves a Multi-agency meeting, for example. | Home visit · Office appointment · Assessment interview · Multi-agency meeting · Court setting · Phone call |
| G | Emotional state | The persona's emotional starting point | Calm · Anxious · Angry · Withdrawn · Resigned · In crisis |
| H | Relationship history | The persona's prior contact with services | New contact · Known — positive · Known — neutral · Known — conflicted · Previous proceedings |
| I | Training focus | The specific skill area prioritised in scoring | Motivational Interviewing · Safeguarding practice · Cultural competence · Power awareness · Statutory authority |
| J ⚙ | Maturity | For young person personas only: language complexity, abstraction level, and how they challenge you. This card is hidden automatically when your target group (Card D) is not a young person or care leaver. | Early adolescent · Mid adolescent · Late adolescent · Persona default |
After a case is generated, you may see an optional control: Was this scenario realistic? with 👍 and 👎 buttons. This is separate from your debrief score — it does not affect assessment.
| Action | What happens |
|---|---|
| 👍 Yes | One click — thanks message. Helps the team track which generated cases feel true to practice. |
| 👎 No | Optional text field — e.g. stereotyped character, wrong tone, unrealistic detail. Then Send. |
| Skip | Valid. Feedback is always voluntary. |
KallosSim has built-in GDPR controls and organisation DPO support — not only a privacy page. On first login you see two notices: how learning data is stored, and how anonymised improvement data may be used. You can review or change preferences anytime from your profile (top-right menu).
| Setting | Where | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| My data usage | Profile menu → My data usage | See stored data, research consent, download export (Art. 15/20), delete training or account (Art. 17), contact org DPO |
| Contact organisation DPO | My data usage → Contact my organisation's DPO | Contest an automated score (DUAA 2025 / Art. 21); acknowledgement within 30 days |
| Platform DPO | dpo@kallossim.com | Provider-level data rights and DPA questions |
| Org DPO email / Privacy & AI Act | Org Admin → Settings / Privacy & AI Act | Team leads and DPOs set DPO email and record DPIA sign-off (not Article 6) |
| Free scenarios counter | Profile menu → subscription card | On the Free plan, shows remaining 20 text + 3 voice sessions (lifetime, not monthly). Voice capped at 10 minutes. |
| How we improve the training | Profile → link under Improvement analytics | Reopens the full transparency notice |
| Contribute anonymised usage | Profile → checkbox (off unless you opt in) | Anonymised usage events only — not conversation text, not research consent. Training works normally either way. |
| Research consent | My data usage modal — Yes / No | Separate explicit consent for de-identified conversation content to improve KallosSim models. Default remains no transcript storage for training. |
Full practice conversations are not stored in our database — only scores, metadata, and short evaluation excerpts (up to 30 days). Contact form submissions are stored to respond and synced to our CRM queue. Two consent surfaces: improvement analytics (usage events, off unless you opt in) is not the same as research Yes/No in My data usage. The marketing-site Accept analytics banner is a third, page-view choice — also not research consent. FAQ: analytics vs research. Full legal detail: Privacy notice · User guide: Built-in GDPR & DPO · Technical design: feedback pipeline (for DPOs). Deployer duties: AI Act for organisations.
If your organisation assigns KallosSim to staff who practise with a simulated person, you are a deployer. That is different from KallosSim as the provider. You do not sign Article 6, affix CE, or file the EU AI database — those are provider decisions, and KallosSim currently claims neither CE marking nor an EU-database filing.
| Duty | What you do | What you do not do |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 50 transparency | Keep the in-app AI disclosure; brief staff that the persona is generated | Hide or skip the notice for "realism" |
| Intended use | Formative practice and reflection only | Use scores for exams, grading, hiring, promotion, or HR appraisal |
| Art. 4 literacy | Onboard people who operate or assign the tool | Assume the disclosure alone is your whole briefing |
| UK GDPR / DPIA | Set DPO email; review privacy notice; DPO records sign-off in Org Admin → Privacy & AI Act | Treat org DPIA sign-off as an Article 6 or CE declaration |
| Incidents | In-app Report, or email hello@kallossim.com with subject "AI Act incident" | Run a Chapter III QMS inside the customer app |
Full deployer note: transparency — deployers · In-app: Org Admin → Privacy & AI Act · Provider register stays in Editorial Admin (not shown to customers).
The Conversation
Once a case is generated, click Start conversation to enter the live simulation. The AI plays a realistic persona based on the scenario — in voice mode, they speak in a natural voice so you can relate to them as a person, not only words on screen. You work through five structured phases at your own pace. The Practice advisor appears first after Generate (bottom-right) so you can ask about this case before or during the conversation.
Before the conversation begins, review the case panel. It contains everything you need to orient yourself:
| Element | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Role badge | "Practising as: Social Worker — Local Authority — Statutory" — reminds you of your professional context and legal footing |
| Scenario title | A one-line description of the case, e.g. "Initial home visit following referral from school re: suspected neglect" |
| Background | A rich paragraph (5–7 sentences) establishing the trigger event, timeline, daily-life context, service history, and what's at stake — enough to place yourself in the situation before the conversation begins |
| Persona | Name, role in the case, emotional state, and relationship to services — who you are about to speak with |
| Setting | Where and how the conversation is taking place (home, office, phone, etc.) |
| Training focus | The specific skill area that the debrief will emphasise |
| Process stage | Your position in the statutory or organisational timeline |
| AI badge | A small "✦ AI enriched" pill appears when the AI has generated bespoke persona details, dialogue nuances, and contextual notes beyond the base scenario — this is the default for every generated case |
The in-app name is Practice advisor. It appears first after Generate succeeds — bottom-right, once a case is active. It is not on the empty Generator or the role picker. Ask it about this case. It is an AI mentor, not verified statutory doctrine, and not a substitute for supervision or legal advice. Legal Advocacy answers are general procedural themes — check citations independently. App or account questions stay with Support (bottom-left). FAQ: What is the Practice advisor?
Text is the default and does not use the voice allowance — use it to draft wording or save voice sessions. Voice lets you hear the persona and reply by microphone. Free includes 3 voice sessions in total, each capped at 10 minutes; then continue in text. Individual and Company include 10 voice sessions per month. Headphones help. FAQ: When should I use text or voice? · Free limits.
The conversation is structured into five phases. Each phase has a distinct purpose and a coaching prompt visible in the phase header. You do not have to complete all five — End & evaluate is always available.
The RC (Relational Capital) bar is a real-time trust score. It reflects how the persona's trust in you is moving during the conversation, derived from their minority stress profile and your communication choices.
| RC goes up when you… | RC goes down when you… |
|---|---|
| Use warmth and genuine curiosity | Assert authority prematurely |
| Validate the person's perspective | Use jargon or bureaucratic language |
| Reflect what they have said back accurately | Interrupt or dismiss concerns |
| Show cultural sensitivity | Make assumptions about motivation |
| Acknowledge power imbalance openly | Ignore emotional cues |
When a scenario has statutory time pressure — for example, a Section 47 enquiry or an Emergency Protection Order — a clock indicator appears at the top of the conversation view. It shows:
Purpose: to practise the discipline of keeping legal deadlines in mind during emotionally pressured conversations — a core competency for statutory practitioners.
The Debrief
After clicking End & evaluate, the AI evaluator reads your full conversation transcript and scores your communication against the dimensions and criteria for this session (sector-specific — not a fixed 5/27). You receive a written report with strengths, development areas, and direct quotes from the conversation.
the AI evaluator reads your full conversation transcript and scores your communication against the criteria loaded for this sector and role (an upper bound of about 40 — not a fixed 5/27 scorecard). The evaluator is a separate AI system. It receives your full transcript, the scenario context, your professional role, and the training focus for this session — then scores each criterion on a 0–3 scale. For each criterion it produces: a numeric score, a written explanation of your strengths, and specific development suggestions with quotes from the conversation.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Not observed — the behaviour was absent from the conversation |
| 1 | Needs development — attempted but inconsistent or ineffective |
| 2 | Meets standard — competent and consistent practice demonstrated |
| 3 | Strong practice — skilled, nuanced, and notably effective |
| Category | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Participation & voice (2) | Person is given adequate speaking space · Practitioner avoids dominating the exchange |
| Transparency & honesty (2) | Role and authority explained clearly · Purpose of the conversation stated openly |
| Non-judgement & empathy (3) | Avoids labelling or moralising · Demonstrates genuine empathy · Validates emotional experience |
| Communication skills (4) | Active listening · De-escalation technique · Cultural sensitivity · Jargon avoidance |
| Safeguarding practice (3) | Information-sharing proportionality · Risk recognition · Multi-agency thinking |
| Motivational Interviewing (5) | Open questions (O) · Affirmations (A) · Reflections (R) · Summaries (S) · Change talk elicitation (E) |
| Role-specific competencies (4) | Statutory authority use · Professional limits observed · Documentation awareness · Person-centred approach |
| Equality & inclusion (4) | Intersectional lens applied · Reasonable adjustments considered · Interpreter / communication need addressed · Power imbalance acknowledged |
In addition to criterion scores, the debrief includes a BARS (Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale) summary across four axes. These give a sector-level view of your practice independent of individual criterion scores.
| Axis | What it measures |
|---|---|
| LC — Legal Compliance | Statutory accuracy: correct application of thresholds, duties, and timescales |
| RE — Relational Engagement | Quality of the working relationship: trust, empathy, responsiveness |
| AS — Autonomy Support | Person-centred practice: supporting the person's right to self-determination |
| PC — Professional Curiosity | Depth of inquiry: probing beyond surface presentations, not accepting reassurances at face value |
MI (Motivational Interviewing) is a collaborative, person-centred communication style designed to strengthen a person's own motivation for change. It is evidence-based and widely used across social work, healthcare, addiction, and HR. KallosSim scores five MI skills using the OARS+E framework:
| Skill | What it means in practice | Example |
|---|---|---|
| O — Open questions | Questions that cannot be answered with yes/no — they invite the person to elaborate in their own words | "What's been going on for you lately?" not "Is everything okay?" |
| A — Affirmations | Genuine statements recognising the person's strengths, efforts, or values — not flattery | "It took courage to open the door today." |
| R — Reflections | Mirroring back what you heard — simple (restatement) or complex (capturing underlying meaning) | "It sounds like the biggest worry right now is what happens to your daughter." |
| S — Summaries | Collecting and linking what has been said — shows you listened, creates shared understanding | "Let me check I've got this right — you've been managing things on your own since the summer, and the school contact surprised you. Is that right?" |
| E — Change talk | Eliciting statements from the person about their own desire, ability, or reason to change — not telling them they need to | "What would things look like if things were a bit easier at home?" |
Your Progress
The Progression view is your personal development dashboard. It shows completed scenarios, score trajectories, dimension coverage, and MI skill development over time.
| Panel | What it shows | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| My learning path | A log of every completed scenario: role, scenario title, date, total score, training focus | Click any entry to reopen the full debrief. Track which roles and process stages you have covered. |
| My development | Score over time (line chart) · Dimension coverage (radar chart) · MI skill breakdown | Look for gaps in the radar — dimensions you haven't practised. Use the MI chart to target specific skills. |
Editorial — for supervisors and team leads
The Editorial view is the supervisor's workspace. Review sessions, generate team training programmes, and monitor aggregate development data across your group.
| Tab | What it contains | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Sessions | All completed sessions for your group — role, scenario, score, date. Click any entry to open the full debrief transcript and conversation. | Use for 1-to-1 supervision — review a practitioner's session before a reflective conversation. Look at both the score and the specific quotes the evaluator cited. |
| Learning Circle | Generate a structured 6-session team training programme based on practice data, team size, and focus areas. | Input team size, current gaps (from Team Overview), experience levels, and priority focus areas. The AI produces a session-by-session plan with objectives, suggested scenarios, and reflection prompts. |
| Team Overview | Aggregate scores, role distribution, dimension coverage gaps, and MI skill averages across all practitioners in your group. | Identify team-level development needs. If the radar shows the whole team is underperforming on Power dynamics, design the next Learning Circle around that dimension. |
The Learning Circle generator takes your team's practice data and creates a 6-session structured programme. Each session plan includes:
Supervisors can see debrief scores, criterion-level breakdowns, and short AI-selected trainee excerpts in the rubric (not full session transcripts). Excerpts are retained for up to 30 days; full dialogue is never stored in the database. All scenario content is AI-generated — no real case data is ever stored. Practitioners are identified in the Editorial view only by the name they registered with.
Organisation administrators (team lead, senior manager, DPO) also have an Org Admin workspace separate from Editorial. Open it from the profile menu. The Quality tab shows:
| Panel | What it shows |
|---|---|
| KPI chips & criterion distribution | Aggregate debrief scores and trends — never individual practitioner names in export views |
| Scenario realism feedback | Optional 👍/👎 responses on AI-generated cases (case title, vote, comment — no user identity) |
| Practice signals | Started / completed / abandoned rates by role, dimension, and conversation type — only when ≥5 sessions exist in a cell |
Settings tab includes a DPO note on how improvement data is scoped to your organisation. Full DPIA status and org sign-off: Org Admin → Privacy & AI Act. See also Privacy & improvement for practitioner controls.
The five diversity dimensions
Card E selects the analytical lens foregrounded in your scenario. Each dimension shapes the persona's profile, the case background, and the criteria most emphasised in your debrief. Dimensions are applied intersectionally — a scenario rarely involves just one lens in isolation.
Concepts & glossary
Key practice terms used in KallosSim — each has a dedicated page. Public index: /glossary. Platform abbreviations (AI, RAG, CPD…) live on Qualities. Full public index below; in-app Concepts tab mirrors MODEL.concepts.
Complete public index: all concept pages →
Full concept index
Every practice term with a dedicated page — full MODEL.concepts set plus marketing extras (DSL, SENCO, RC, CAFCASS…). Platform abbreviations remain on Qualities.
Frequently asked questions
dialogtrainer-en.vercel.app reject QA Guest. Full answer: public FAQ.